Skip to main content

For people who hire

A person or a model?

It is the question we are asked most. We do not answer it with an opinion — we answer it with what companies are already asking for in their own adverts, counted one by one.

Counted on the board, now

63% of adverts ask for skills a model does not have

Across 13,647 open positions, 8,639 list interpersonal skills explicitly among the requirements. We did not infer them: employers wrote them.

  • communication3971
  • collaboration3511
  • leadership2118
  • continuous learning957
  • teamwork888
  • attention to detail874
  • problem solving813
  • autonomy783

Counted at request time across the active, public postings on this platform. No sample data.

What this number says, and what it does not

It does not say a model is useless. It says the jobs companies hire for contain, in the large majority of cases, something exercised between people: persuading, coordinating, deciding when the data runs out, noticing what nobody asked about.

And the market says it, not us. These are requirements employers wrote unprompted, on real openings, across 45 countries. If the answer were really to automate, those requirements would not be there.

The problem is a different one: in candidates, nobody can measure those skills. On a CV they are a word. That is where we are useful, and only there.

How we make them checkable

A student uploads real work. The analysis pulls out the skills it demonstrates — the technical ones and the interpersonal ones. A teacher can evaluate the work when the student asks. What reaches you is not the candidate's claim: it is the work itself, with the teacher's evaluation when there is one.

See the candidatesCompare with your ATS