A person or a model?
It is the question we are asked most. We do not answer it with an opinion — we answer it with what companies are already asking for in their own adverts, counted one by one.
Not Another Job Platform.
Counted on the board, now
72% of adverts ask for skills a model does not have
Across 10.679 open positions, 7642 list interpersonal skills explicitly among the requirements. We did not infer them: employers wrote them.
Counted at request time across the active, public postings on this platform. No sample data.
What this number says, and what it does not
It does not say a model is useless. It says the jobs companies hire for contain, in the large majority of cases, something exercised between people: persuading, coordinating, deciding when the data runs out, noticing what nobody asked about.
And the market says it, not us. These are requirements employers wrote unprompted, on real openings, across 45 countries. If the answer were really to automate, those requirements would not be there.
The problem is a different one: in candidates, nobody can measure those skills. On a CV they are a word. That is where we are useful, and only there.
How we make them checkable
A student uploads real work. The analysis pulls out the skills it demonstrates — the technical ones and the interpersonal ones. The teacher who supervised it confirms them. What reaches you is not the candidate's claim: it is an attestation from somebody who watched them work.