A verified trust layer for student-to-work.
Across disciplines — tech, engineering, business, science, design — matching people to roles is hard when skills are self-reported. We're building a layer where institutions can verify student work, companies see clearer signals, and students carry portable proof across the EU. Starting in Italy.
Where a CV alone falls short
- Self-reported skills with no evidence attached
- Projects summarised in a line instead of shown
- Favours how people write about themselves
- Hard to compare candidates across institutions
- A mismatched hire costs around €4,000 — industry estimate
What we add
- Institution-verified projects in any format
- Hard and soft skills surfaced from evidence
- A profile that complements — doesn't replace — the CV
- Work you can actually look at, not just claims
- Matches you can explain, with human review available
What we're trying to do
differently
A platform where skills are verified, matches are explained, and requirements are clearer.
The context
- →Self-reported skills
Without institutional verification, skills are hard to validate — which leads to mismatched hires on both sides.
- →Unexplained matches
When matching isn't explained, candidates don't know what to improve and recruiters can't audit decisions.
- →Vague requirements
When job descriptions are vague, candidates can't self-assess fit and apply broadly instead of relevantly.
- →Feedback that doesn't come back
Without data flowing back to universities, curricula drift away from what employers actually need.
Our approach
- Institution-verified skills
Hard skills (Python, AutoCAD, Excel) and soft skills (teamwork, leadership, communication) tied to projects, courses, and institutional records.
- Explainable matching
Every match surfaces the why (e.g. "your Python project matches 3 of 4 requirements"). No black box; students can ask for human review.
- Two-way transparency
Companies state requirements clearly. Students see exactly what jobs ask for. Institutions see which skills are being searched for most.
- Clear audit trails
Students see who viewed their work. Institutions see hiring patterns. GDPR Art. 15-ready.
What you get today
Trust takes time to build. We'd rather earn it step by step than promise it upfront.
Our mission
We'd like to contribute to a European way of hiring where what a person can actually do is visible — verified by the institutions that taught them. Not a replacement for the CV; an honest complement to it.
"Work that speaks for itself, paths that can be explained, hiring decisions you can stand behind."
— InTransparency
Why we started
There's a gap in EU hiring: companies can't easily find the right graduates, and graduates can't easily find roles that fit. The tools in between — CVs, job boards, opaque algorithms — weren't designed for trust.
We think transparency helps. When a student's work is verified by their university, a recruiter has something to work with beyond claims. When a company states clearer requirements, a student has a fairer chance of finding their fit. When outcomes are tracked, universities can see their impact.
We started in Bergamo. The scope is European: we'd like a continent where a mechanical engineer from Brescia and a data scientist from Berlin can be evaluated on the same, verifiable grounds.
That's the layer we're trying to build.
What we care about
Skills alongside stories
What you've built adds to how you describe it. A verified project is evidence a reader can examine.
Access over gatekeeping
Visibility shouldn't depend on which school is on your letterhead. We'd like every student's work to get a fair look.
Transparency over opacity
Students see who views their work. Companies see verified data. Institutions see real outcomes. No hidden algorithms, no black boxes.
Proof alongside words
Institution-verified work sits next to a candidate's own description — together they're better.
Why it's free today
We want talent to be discoverable before it's commercial
Students: full access
Build your verified portfolio with all core features included.
Academic partners: full access
Verify student projects. Track placements. Measure outcomes.
Companies: pay per contact
Browse verified profiles freely. Pay only when you reach out.
How we think about it
Students create the value. People who put the work in should have full access to the tools that showcase it. Students aren't charged just to be visible.
Universities and schools drive verification. The base platform is free for academic partners. Enterprise add-ons (API, white-label, custom features) are available if you need them.
Companies pay for outcomes. Browse the verified pool at no cost. Pay when you decide to contact a candidate — not upfront.
Early access
We're in early development — the best time to shape what we build
Help shape the platform
We're looking for students, academic partners, and companies who want to shape how this works. Feedback at this stage has outsized effect.
A portfolio alongside your CV
The CV has been useful for a long time, and it still is. What's been missing is a verifiable companion to it — a way for an employer to see the actual work, not just a line describing it.
Students get judged on work that speaks for itself. Companies get signals they can audit. Neither replaces the other — together they just make hiring clearer.
Get Started — Show Your WorkGet involved
We're still early. If this resonates, your feedback has outsized influence on what we build next.
For companies: Browse verified talent, pay only for contacts