Skip to main content
For mid-market companies and HR teams

Not one more software, more brilliant people.

Skills extracted from students' real projects. Match on the artifact, not the keyword — and reach them before your inbox does.

Not Another Job Platform.

Every candidate
Every candidate, backed by real evidence.
interface preview · sample numbers
Where we are today
Universities, ITS academies and the recognition behind where InTransparency is today.

The problem

You already know how it goes.

300 CVs, all the same buzzwords.

Hours spent screening keywords.

Barely any time talking to real talent.

Your best candidate is in there. You just can’t see them.

Résumé vs proof

A résumé makes you guess. A Decision Pack lets you decide.

On the left, a self-declared profile you can't verify. On the right, the same skills linked to evidence in real work.

What résumés / LinkedIn show
What InTransparency shows
M.R.
Marco R.
Aspiring Data Scientist · Open to work
Milano, IT 2 yrs Intern · summer 2025
Skills
PythonMachine LearningTime SeriesSQLStatisticsTensorFlow
About
  • “Passionate data scientist with hands-on experience…”
  • “Strong foundation in machine learning and statistics.”
  • “Eager to apply analytics in industrial contexts.”
No way to verify any of this from inside the platform.
Decision Pack · 94% match · live
Marco R. · Engineering MSc · 2026
Time-series forecasting on industrial demand
OutreachHire
Verified evidence
ARIMA / SARIMAthesis · ch. 3
Python · pandasforecast-arima.ipynb
Statistical inferencethesis · ch. 4
Data wranglingpreprocess.py
Every claim is one click from the artifact that proves it.
Self-declared. No way to verify.
vs
You guess. You schedule a call. You hope.
You decide in minutes — with the source attached.
Self-declared résumé vs a verified Decision Pack.
Evidence first

What hiring on evidence changes

Built for companies that get 200+ CVs per role and convert one into an offer.

Proof, up front
The evidence is on the profile before you make contact
Skills extracted from real projects — each one linked to its artifact
Confirmed work
Professors and schools can confirm the coursework behind a skill
Marked on the profile when a professor has endorsed the work
Your ATS
Greenhouse (full push), Lever (one-way); more in beta
Shortlists land in the tool your team already works in
The difference

Traditional recruiting vs pre-verified flow

Traditional recruiting
  • Hundreds of CVs per role, most off-target
  • Self-reported skills to verify in interviews
  • Weeks of phone screens before the first tech interview
  • Bias on the name, on the school, on CV formatting
  • Diversity reporting done manually in Excel
With InTransparency feeding your ATS
  • 5-15 pre-verified candidates pushed to Greenhouse or Lever (more in beta)
  • Skills extracted by AI from real projects, theses, reports, code, design, and other actual work
  • Decision Pack downloadable before you schedule an interview
  • Match score broken down by criterion, with the evidence behind each
  • Audit log exportable as : candidate contacts, searches and profile views by date range
Talent search

Search on verified skills. Get a Decision Pack.

Search by real skill, compare ranked candidates and open the evidence behind every match — without leaving the platform.

EU Pay Transparency · Directive 2023/970

Is your hiring pay-transparency ready?

The EU directive is in force. Run a 2-minute readiness check — get your gaps and an action plan.

Check your readiness
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

For companies · Italy

Want early-career talent with verified skills?

We're onboarding the first companies in Italy. Tell us who you're hiring and we'll show you how to reach students and graduates assessed on proven skills, not just a CV.

We reply within a few business days.

By submitting you agree to be contacted by the InTransparency team. No spam.