Skip to main content

Decision Pack

A two-page dossier per candidate, with a source on every line.

A candidate's skills, projects and grades: what you read before deciding whether to book an interview.

What's in it

The same structure for every candidate

01

Skills and sources

Each skill with the projects it comes from and its tier: evaluated by a teacher, extracted by the AI, or self-reported.

02

Grades in context

Each grade as awarded, with its scale and pass mark.

03

Institutional context

Programme, tutor, internship company, completion year.

04

Soft skills from project work (optional)

Only those the AI read across the student's projects, with the projects behind each one. No personality test.

05

Fit signal, with its inputs

A hand-weighted score, with the factors that move it. It is not calibrated on hiring outcomes, so it is not a probability of being hired.

06

Teacher evaluation (optional)

If a teacher evaluated the project, at the student's request: their name, the project and their comment, if they left one.

Example

This is what the Decision Pack actually looks like

A sample candidate, with sample data.

Elena R.

Emergency medicine track, hospital-data thesis

Medical school · Milan — MD, Medicine and Surgery (6-year)

Evaluated by a teacher

4/4 projects evaluated by a teacher

Skills and sources

  • Clinical reasoning

    3 sources

    Evaluated by a teacher

  • Statistical analysis (R)

    2 sources

    AI-extracted

  • Hospital protocol design

    2 sources

    AI-extracted

  • Medical English

    2 sources

    Self-reported

Main project

Triage protocol redesign for ED throughput — teaching-hospital pilot

Grade: 110 cum laude / 110

Evaluated by a teacher

110 cum laude / 110

Grade

1

Teacher evaluations

3

Skills

“Elena ran the protocol pilot end-to-end. The follow-up data she produced is now being used to inform the regional triage standard.”
— Evaluated by Supervising physician, emergency medicine · 5/5

What the evidence supports

  • Confirmed clinical exposure: 4 of 4 hospital rotations independently signed off by attending physicians.
  • Quantitative rigor: Thesis includes regression analysis on 8,400 ED admissions.
  • Teacher’s evaluation: The teacher’s evaluation cites measurable impact on regional protocol, not attendance.

Who reads a Decision Pack

Whoever screens, and whoever decides

Talent acquisition

Generates it for the candidates they are assessing and sends it to whoever decides.

Hiring manager

Checks which project each skill comes from and what teachers have evaluated.