For recruiters & HR
The verified-evidence alternative to Ashby, Greenhouse & Lever
The leading ATSs are built for companies that already have the candidates. InTransparency adds what they can’t: candidates whose skills are verified from real work, native EN/IT, EU pay-transparency built in, and a free tier.
In short
For hiring early-career talent in Europe we win on verified evidence, EN/IT language fit, EU compliance and price. They’re still ahead on scheduling, integrations, analytics and enterprise scale — gaps we’re actively building on (shown transparently below).
Verified evidence & matching
| Feature | InTransparency | Ashby | Greenhouse | Lever | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Skills verified from real project work AI extracts skills from the actual artifacts; the institution verifies — not a self-reported CV. | |||||
Transparent, evidence-weighted match score Per-candidate fit breakdown; verified evidence outweighs self-declared claims. | |||||
Candidate evidence dossier (Decision Pack) |
EU fit & early-career
| Feature | InTransparency | Ashby | Greenhouse | Lever | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Native EN/IT interface + candidate career page Ashby's UI is English-only with no built-in career-page localization. | |||||
Early-career / university talent pipeline | |||||
EU Pay Transparency audit trail (Dir. 2023/970) Burden-of-proof decision log; no salary-history collection by design. | |||||
AI Act decision log & explainability | |||||
Italian hiring context (tirocinio, CCNL) |
Recruiting workflow
| Feature | InTransparency | Ashby | Greenhouse | Lever | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pipeline / kanban (ATS) | |||||
Structured interviews & scorecards | |||||
AI-generated interview kits | |||||
Outreach sequences | |||||
Interview scheduling & calendar sync On our roadmap — today this is a genuine gap vs the ATS leaders. |
Sourcing & search
| Feature | InTransparency | Ashby | Greenhouse | Lever | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Built-in verified candidate pool | |||||
Raw candidate database scale Workable aggregates a large unverified DB; ours trades raw volume for verified evidence as supply grows. | |||||
No metered email-lookup cap Ashby Foundations caps email lookups (≈200/mo per third-party analyses). |
Integrations, analytics & scale
| Feature | InTransparency | Ashby | Greenhouse | Lever | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATS / HRIS integration breadth We have Greenhouse (2-way) + Lever live today; the leaders ship hundreds. | |||||
One-click job-board syndication | |||||
Deep analytics & custom reporting | |||||
Enterprise SSO / SAML / SOC 2 | |||||
Native mobile recruiter app |
Pricing & access
| Feature | InTransparency | Ashby | Greenhouse | Lever | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Permanent free tier Ashby/Greenhouse/Lever have no free tier; Workable is a 15-day trial. | |||||
Public, transparent pricing Greenhouse and Lever are quote-only; Ashby publishes its entry price; we publish all plans. | |||||
No per-employee / headcount true-ups Ashby/Greenhouse/Lever bill on total company headcount, with mid-contract increases as you grow. | |||||
Affordable for low-volume / early-career hiring Ashby starts from $400/mo; we start free, then €89/mo. |
What we’re building next
We’re honest about where the leaders are still ahead. Here’s what we’re building to close the gaps:
- Deeper analytics & custom report builder
- Interview scheduling + calendar sync
- EU/Italian HRIS integrations (Zucchetti, TeamSystem, Personio…)
- Native mobile recruiter app
- Enterprise SSO / SAML + SOC 2
Competitor facts verified June 2026 from official pricing pages and Vendr/PriceLevel/Pin. Features change — verify on the official sites before purchase decisions.